From both a historical and practical point of view, trusts are generally designed to have only one door. This situation is due to the complications that may arise, particularly in non-EU jurisdictions, to determine the nature of the real estate deposited in the trust and the proportionality of the contributions of multi-donors within the company.  However, a growing trend for husbands and wives is to create “common trusts,” both of which are “grantors” of the trust, reflecting the well-known concept of rental property.  For a living trust, the fellow may retain some control over the Trust, for example. B by appointment as protector under the fiduciary instrument. In practice, the life of trusts is generally largely tax-driven. In the event of a living trust failure, the property is generally held for grantor/Settlor on the resulting trusts, which has had disastrous tax consequences in some remarkable cases. [Citation required] The agent must also keep adequate records of the management of the trust in general.  All trust properties must remain separate from the personal property of the agent and should not be “coming” in.  An agent may hold certain securities, usually listed on the stock exchange, in a “street name” or a register nominated to facilitate administration.  However, they remain subject to the rule that these securities must be “assigned” specifically in the records of a given receiver account.  Most laws governing the constitution and administration of trusts in the United States are now legislated at the state level. In August 2004, the National Conference of Commissioners on State Uniform Laws introduced the first attempt to codify the generally accepted common law principles in Anglo-American law with respect to trusts into a uniform legal code for fifty states, called uniformity trust code (UTC).
 Since July 2012, 25 states have adopted some form of UTC content and three others have incorporated it into the legislature for adoption.  Trusts may be created by the express intentions of Settlors  or may be created by the application of laws known as implicit trusts. A tacit trust is created by a court of justice because of the actions or situations of the parties. Implicit positions of trust are divided into two categories: result and constructive. The resulting confidence is implicit in the law in establishing the presumed intentions of the parties, but it does not take into account their explicit intent.